Legal entity mismatch found before a deposit
Updated: 2026-08-31
Illustrative examples based on common buyer scenarios. These are anonymised method walk-throughs, not client testimonials.
A high-value order was about to be placed with a trading arm while the quality certificates were held by a parent entity. The on-site audit caught the mismatch before any deposit moved.
Scenario
The supplier presented ISO and product certificates at the negotiation stage. The contract, however, named a different legal entity within the same group. The buyer booked an on-site audit before releasing a deposit.
What we did
- 1. Confirmed the legal entity that would sign the contract during the audit walk-through.
- 2. Checked the certificate scope: the certificates were issued to the parent entity, not the contracting entity.
- 3. Reviewed the production site and confirmed it belonged to the parent factory.
- 4. Documented the finding and required the contract to be re-issued to the certified entity.
Result
The contract was re-issued to the certified parent entity, the deposit was released against documentary evidence, and the audit finding was closed with no delay to the production schedule.
Related guides
Need this done for your supplier?
Send your requirement and we will scope the verification, audit or inspection for your product and market.